MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969351707 · doi:10.3138/utq.88.2.12

Global Rhythms: Setting the Stage for World Poetry in 1960s London

2019· article· en· W2969351707 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jacob Edmond

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryIncarnationCountercultureInternationalism (politics)Spoken wordContext (archaeology)LiteratureAmerican poetryArtHistoryArt historyTheologyPhilosophyLawPoliticsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article locates the origins of contemporary understandings of world poetry in a set of institutions and poetic practices that developed in the 1960s, as evinced by a series of performances in London at that time, including the 1965 International Poetry Incarnation, organized by Allen Ginsberg; Andrei Voznesensky’s near-simultaneous performance at the Theatre Royal Stratford; Kamau Brathwaite’s 1967 performance of Rights of Passage at the Jeanetta Cochrane Theatre; and a 1969 bilingual performance of Aimé Césaire’s Cahier d’un retour au pays natal, directed by John La Rose. The concerns of the Caribbean Artists Movement, which sponsored the latter two performances, seem far from the Cold War and counterculture context of the International Poetry Incarnation. Yet both took inspiration from the theatrical performances of Russian poets like Voznesensky. Such surprising interconnections reflect a newly self-conscious poetic internationalism, for which Voznesensky, Ginsberg, Brathwaite, and La Rose all sought a formal embodiment in the global rhythms of the performed and tape-recorded word.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.178

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.024
Scholarly communication0.0110.006
Open science0.0000.007
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlySame topicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207