Discourses of Sustainable Finance Implementation in Islamic Bank (Cases Studies in Bank Mandiri Syariah 2018)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The execution of sustainable finance (SF) in Islamic Bank (Sharia Bank) should be fused with financial products and services due to the compatibility of SF programs with Sharia rules. This article points to define the progress of SF implementation in the Bank Mandiri Syariah before the mandatory to implement regulation from financial Services Authority No. 1/POJK. 3/2017. The method used is qualitative and confined with the following research question (1) What is the precedence of the Government in implementing sustainable finance by regulation No. 51/POJK. 03/2017? (2) How is the progress of sustainable financial implementation on sharia banks during the period 2017 to 2018?. According to the results of the study through secondary data from financial statements, annual reports, and the company's internal data. The Bank Mandiri Syariah has implemented SF during 2018 with the well-presented portion of SF financing ratio from total financing amounting to 29.56%. Beside of that Bank Mandiri Syariah also already established the sustainable finance plan for five years (2019-2014). Nevertheless, to increase the community trust in Sharia banks regarding the suitable implement of SF in the future. The Islamic Bank need to ensure the commit from all stakeholders to make sharia products and services that implant in the SF program.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".