Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ex,président de l'Université du Québec et ex,président du conseil supérieur de l'éducation et actuel sous,ministre de l'Éducation, Gouvernement du Québec Quels étaient les perspectives et les desseins de la Commission Parent au sujet de l'université?Quelle idée s'en faisait,elle?Comment et vers quoi sou, haitait,elle qu'elle évolue au Québec ?Et que reste+il de cette vision quarante ans plus tard?Telles sont les questions qu'on m'a invité à traiter dans le cadre de la présente parution de ce Bulletin.Le format convenu ne permettant évidemment pas toutes les analyses qu'il faudrait conduire, on s'en tiendra ici aux principaux paramètres et à l'ossature de ce que nous pouvons légitimement appeler le « projet » de la Commission Parent en regard de l'université québécoise, et dont on s'appli, quera à cerner la visée d'origine et l'évolution.Association québécoise d'histoire politique
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.074 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".