Transcriptome and Network Dissection of Microsatellite Stable and Highly Instable Colorectal Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide with high number of mortality every year. Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a considerable feature of CRC which affects prognosis and treatment. High level of MSI or MSI-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer has better prognosis and immunotherapy response, while microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC has better response to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. More studies are needed, specifically on MSS CRC which has worse prognosis, to further reveal biological differences and similarities between MSS and MSI colorectal cancer, which may equip us with the knowledge to develop more promising therapeutic approaches to target both types or be more effective for each type. Methods: We aimed to find affected biological processes and their regulators in both type, MSS and MSI-H, of CRC; as well as reveal specific ones in each type. We applied meta- and network analysis on freely available transcriptome data in MSS and MSI-H colorectal cancer from gene expression omnibus (GEO) database to detect common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and critical biological processes and predict their most significant regulators. Results: Our results demonstrate considerable up and downregulation in cell cycle and lipid catabolism processes, respectively; and introduced MYC and FOXM1 as two central and up-stream regulators of DEGs in both type of CRC. Chemokine-mediated processes displayed up-regulation in MSI-H type, while metastasis-related processes showed more activation in MSS CRC. Additionally, DACH1 and TP53 were detected as two important transcription factors that differentially expressed just in MSS and MSI-H, respectively. Conclusion: Our results can explain why MSI and MSS CRC display different immunotherapy response, prognosis, and metastasis feature. Moreover, our predicted up-stream regulators in the regulatory networks may be promising therapeutic targets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".