MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969478080 · doi:10.2312/exp.20191077

Single Stroke Aerial Robot Light Painting

2019· article· en· W2969478080 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEurographics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrajectoryComputer visionRobotArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePiecewiseSet (abstract data type)CurvaturePosition (finance)Range (aeronautics)Plane (geometry)MathematicsEngineeringGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates trajectory generation alternatives for creating single-stroke light paintings with a small quadrotor robot. We propose to reduce the cost of a minimum snap piecewise polynomial quadrotor trajectory passing through a set of waypoints by displacing those waypoints towards or away from the camera while preserving their projected position. It is in regions of high curvature, where waypoints are close together, that we make modifications to reduce snap, and we evaluate two different strategies: one that uses a full range of depths to increase the distance between close waypoints, and another that tries to keep the final set of waypoints as close to the original plane as possible. Using a variety of one-stroke animal illustrations as targets, we evaluate and compare the cost of different optimized trajectories, and discuss the qualitative and quantitative quality of flights captured in long exposure photographs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it