MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969534908

Québec-Presse : Un journal libre et engagé (1969-1974)

2015· book· fr· W2969534908 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jacques Keable

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Editions Ecosociété eBooks · 2015
Typebook
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Faire cause commune avec les classes populaires et les syndicats, combattre le capitalisme, lutter pour l'independance du Quebec... Le journal Quebec-Presse, qui parut de 1969 a 1974, n'a jamais pretendu etre «neutre» et «objectif». Bien au contraire! Revendiquant et assumant une totale independance journalistique, y compris a l'egard des syndicats qui le financaient, cet hebdomadaire progressiste voulait faire contrepoids aux medias de masse et bloquer la route aux fossoyeurs des acquis de la Revolution tranquille. Artisan de la premiere heure de Quebec-Presse, Jacques Keable retrace ici l'histoire de cette aventure journalistique aussi exceptionnelle qu'inspirante. Truffe d'anecdotes parfois rocambolesques, son « recit de l'interieur » nous fait revivre tout un pan de l'histoire du Quebec, de la crise d'Octobre 1970 au Front commun intersyndical de 1972, en passant par les luttes feministes, la defense de la langue francaise, la pollution de l'environnement ou la corruption dans le monde municipal. Il nous fait aussi partager la vie de cette salle de redaction qui fonctionnait en autogestion et ou se croisaient Gerald Godin, Jacques Parizeau, Micheline Lachance et meme ? secret bien garde revele par l'auteur ? Rejean Ducharme, tres discret correcteur de ce journal empecheur de tourner en rond. Mais la liberte a un prix. Apres cinq ans de travail journalistique qui agaca profondement bien des personnalites publiques, a commencer par Rene Levesque, l'hebdomadaire du dimanche croula sous les problemes d'argent. A la lumiere de cette experience, Jacques Keable nous met en garde contre les dangers de l'hyper-concentration actuelle des medias et nous rappelle la necessite vitale, pour une societe democratique, de conserver une information diversifiee au service du bien commun.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0120.024
Science and technology studies0.0110.004
Scholarly communication0.0120.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0900.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Editions Ecosociété eBooksSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207