MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969546891 · doi:10.7202/1060126ar

La critique musicale : de la théorie à la pratique

2019· article· fr· W2969546891 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Margalida Amengual Garí, Hubert Bolduc-Cloutier, Chloé Huvet, Marie-Pier Leduc

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue musicale OICRM · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La journée d’étude La critique musicale. De la théorie à la pratique organisée par l’Observatoire interdisciplinaire de création et de recherche en musique (OICRM) s’est déroulée le 13 mars 2015 à la Faculté de musique de l’Université de Montréal. Six conférenciers (Michel Duchesneau, Valérie Dufour, Marie-Thérèse Lefebvre, Emmanuel Reibel, Pascal Lécroart et Timothée Picard) y ont présenté les résultats de leurs recherches sur la critique musicale en pays francophones. Ce texte, qui consiste en un compte rendu critique de cette journée d’étude, se concentre autour de trois axes de réflexion : 1) théorisation et pratique de la critique musicale ; 2) critique musicale et statut socioprofessionnel des critiques ; 3) critique musicale et individualisme méthodologique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue musicale OICRMSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207