MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969549583 · doi:10.2134/age2019.05.0032

Nitrate Leaching and Potato Yield under Varying Plow Timing and Nitrogen Rate

2019· article· en· W2969549583 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Yefang Jiang, Judith Nyiraneza, Mohammad Khakbazan, Xiaoyuan Geng, Brian J. Murray

Bibliographic record

VenueAgrosystems Geosciences & Environment · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsBrandon UniversityHealth PEIAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsLeaching (pedology)PloughAgronomyLysimeterNitrateFertilizerHordeum vulgareEnvironmental scienceRed CloverChemistrySoil waterPoaceaeSoil scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Core Ideas Fall plowing created more post–fall‐plowing nitrate leaching than spring plowing. Fall or spring plowing did not influence post–potato‐harvest nitrate leaching and potato yield. Increasing fertilizer N input to potato crops increased post–potato‐harvest nitrate leaching. Increasing fertilizer N input to potato crops suppressed potato yield. Excessive nitrate leaching from potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) production has been linked to groundwater nitrate contamination and eutrophication in receiving surface water. This study was conducted to assess the effects on nitrate leaching and potato yield of delaying red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) plowing from late fall to spring in a barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)–red clover–potato rotation and varying additions of fertilizer N to potato crops in Prince Edward Island, Canada, between 2014 and 2017. The experiment used a split‐plot arrangement in a completely randomized design with three replications. A stainless steel lysimeter was installed in each plot to collect soil water to test nitrate concentrations in leachate. Nitrate leaching occurred primarily between late fall, after the potato harvest, and in spring. Delaying forage plowing from late fall to spring reduced post–fall‐plowing nitrate leaching but had no influence on either post–potato‐harvest nitrate leaching or potato yield. Increasing fertilizer N input to the potato crops was shown to not only increase the risk of excessive nitrate leaching but also to suppress potato yield. Higher levels of soil N supplies from the mineralization of the plowed‐down red clover and soil organic matter to the potato crops in combination with a shorter than ideal growth period for the long‐season Russet Burbank potato appear to create overfertilizing situations, resulting in excessive post–potato‐harvest nitrate leaching and suppressed yields. Adequately accounting for soil N supplies is critical for enhancing potato productivity while minimizing nitrate leaching.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgrosystems Geosciences & EnvironmentSame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207