FullMonteCUDA: a fast, flexible, and accurate GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo simulator for light propagation in turbid media
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Optimizing light delivery for photodynamic therapy, quantifying tissue optical properties or reconstructing 3D distributions of sources in bioluminescence imaging and absorbers in diffuse optical imaging all involve solving an inverse problem. This can require thousands of forward light propagation simulations to determine the parameters to optimize treatment, image tissue or quantify tissue optical properties, which is time-consuming and computationally expensive. Addressing this problem requires a light propagation simulator that produces results quickly given modelling parameters. In previous work, we developed FullMonteSW: currently the fastest, tetrahedral-mesh, Monte Carlo light propagation simulator written in software. Additional software optimizations showed diminishing performance improvements, so we investigated hardware acceleration methods. This work focuses on FullMonteCUDA: a GPU-accelerated version of FullMonteSW which targets NVIDIA GPUs. FullMonteCUDA has been validated across several benchmark models and, through various GPU-specific optimizations, achieves a 288-936x speedup over the single-threaded, non-vectorized version of FullMonteSW and a 4-13x speedup over the highly optimized, hand-vectorized and multi-threaded version. The increase in performance allows inverse problems to be solved more efficiently and effectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".