MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969572703 · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00683

Mental Health Effects in Primary Care Patients 18 Months After a Major Wildfire in Fort McMurray: Risk Increased by Social Demographic Issues, Clinical Antecedents, and Degree of Fire Exposure

2019· article· en· W2969572703 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Shahram Moosavi, Bernard Nwaka, Idowu Akinjise, Sandra E. Corbett, Pierre Chue, Andrew J. Greenshaw, Peter H. Silverstone, Xin‐Min Li, Vincent I. O. Agyapong

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Psychiatry · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsPrimary careMental healthMedicinePsychiatryEnvironmental healthClinical psychologyPsychologyFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: To assess prevalence of likely Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) in patients attending the only out-of-hours primary care clinic in Fort McMurray some 18 months following a major fire. Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional survey was used to collect data through self-administered paper-based questionnaires to determine likely PTSD, MDD and GAD using the PTSD Checklists for DSM 5, PHQ 9 and GAD-7 respectively from residents of Fort McMurray who were impacted by the wildfires. This was carried out eighteen (18) months after a major wildfire which required the rapid evacuation of the entire city population (approximately 90,000 individuals). Results: We achieved a response rate of 48% and results from the 290 respondents showed the one month prevalence rates for likely PTSD was 13.6%, likely MDD was 24.8%, and likely GAD was 18.0%. Compared to self-reported prevalence rates before the wildfire (0%, 15.2%, and 14.5% respectively) these were increased for all diagnoses. After controlling for other factors in a logistic regression model, there were statistically significant associations between individuals who had likely PTSD, MDD and GAD diagnoses and multiple socio-demographic, clinical, and exposure-related variables as follows:. PTSD: History of Anxiety Disorder and received counselling had Odds Ratios (ORs) of 5.80 and 7.14 respectively. MDD: Age, witnessed the burning of homes, history of Depressive Disorder and receiving low level support from friends and family had ORs of 2.08, 2.29, 4.63 and 2.5 respectively. GAD: Fearful for their lives or the lives of friends/family, history of Depressive Disorder, and history of Anxiety Disorder had odds ratios of 3.52, 3.04, and 2.68 respectively. There were also associations between individuals with a likely psychiatric diagnosis and those who also had likely alcohol or drug abuse/dependence. Conclusion: Our study suggests there are high prevalence rates for mental health and addiction conditions in patients attending the out-of-hours clinic 18 months after the wildfires, with significant associations between multiple variables and likely PTSD, MDD and GAD. Further studies are needed to explore the impact of population based mental health interventions on the long term mental health effects of the wildfires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PsychiatrySame topicPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207