MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969585461

Vu d’ici... L’intégration de la diversité : des paroles aux actes

2019· article· fr· W2969585461 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean-Pierre Dupuis, Simona Camelia Plopeanu

Bibliographic record

VenueCairn.info · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TOUT COMME LE JAPON, L’ALLEMAGNE, LE DANEMARK OU LA SUEDE, LE CANADA DOIT FAIRE FACE A DES DEFIS SPECIFIQUES EN MATIERE DE GESTION DE LA DIVERSITE AU SEIN DES ENTREPRISES. BIEN QU’IL EXISTE DEJA UN CERTAIN NOMBRE DE PROGRAMMES ET DE MECANISMES D’INCLUSION, UN ECART SUBSISTE ENTRE LES INTENTIONS ET LA PRATIQUE. JEAN-PIERRE DUPUIS, PROFESSEUR TITULAIRE AU DEPARTEMENT DE MANAGEMENT DE HEC MONTREAL, FAIT LE POINT SUR CETTE QUESTION.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.014
Scholarly communication0.0120.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCairn.infoSame topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207