Promoting Global Economic Development and Economic Sustainability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the March 2019 deadline looming very close, the EU Referendum has had far reaching implications, so far, on the UK economy - even though such repercussions are considered to be short term. Will the UK adopt a Canadian model, a Norwegian model, Singaporean or another type of model in the event of a “no deal situation” or rather, in the event that its proposed Chequers Plan/deal is abandoned? On a more positive note, as soon as a deal is reached, there will be 21 months, from the 29th March 2019, to undertake preparations to accommodate all necessary plans – a period during which the UK will also be able to negotiate free trade deals with other countries. In addition to other vital points such as the UK leaving the Common Agricultural Policy and the Common Fisheries Policy, no hard border between Northern Ireland and the UK, Britain exiting EU rules on services, and the end annual payments to the EU budgets, other main repercussions of a Chequers Deal include restriction in the freedom of movement, the establishment of a “joint committee” whereby the role of the ECJ will end in relation to UK matters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".