MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969613597 · doi:10.1364/oe.27.025078

Ultrafast laser burst-train filamentation for non-contact scribing of optical glasses

2019· article· en· W2969613597 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jianzhao Li, Erdem Yigit Ertorer, Peter R. Herman

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Material Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFilamentationMaterials scienceUltrashort pulseProtein filamentOpticsLaserBurst mode (computing)OptoelectronicsComposite materialElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A systematic study of glass scribing is presented on the benefits of ultrafast laser burst trains in generating filamentation tracks to guide cleaving of glass substrates. The interplay of Kerr self-focusing, plasma defocusing, and burst-train accumulation effects in filament formation was characterized by time-resolved in-situ microscopic imaging. Various filament-track scribing geometries were compared with and without assistance from burst-train pulse delivery or surface V-groove ablation. The cleaving guidance and reproducibility were examined together with the breaking force, facet morphology and flexural strength of cleaved substrates to assess the overall scribing and cleaving quality. The reported results attest to the benefits and flexibility of burst-mode ultrafast laser interactions to assist cleaving of optically transparent materials along well formed filament arrays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ExpressSame topicLaser Material Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207