MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969650566 · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2019.07.040

The evolution of long noncoding RNA acceptance in prostate cancer initiation, progression, and its clinical utility in disease management

2019· review· en· W2969650566 on OpenAlexafffund
Varune Rohan Ramnarine, Maxim Kobelev, Ewan A. Gibb, Mannan Nouri, Dong Lin, Yuzhuo Wang, Ralph Buttyan, Elai Davicioni, Amina Zoubeidi, Colin C. Collins

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Urology · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsPrevention of Organ FailureBC Cancer AgencyDecipher Biosciences (Canada)University of British Columbia
FundersU.S. Food and Drug AdministrationMitacsTerry Fox FoundationProstate Cancer Canada
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerDiseaseProstateLong non-coding RNACancerNon-coding RNAProstate diseaseTumor progressionBioinformaticsOncologyRNAPathologyInternal medicineGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CONTEXT: It is increasingly evident that non-protein-coding regions of the genome can give rise to transcripts that form functional layers of the cancer genome. One of most abundant classes in these regions is long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). They have gained increasing attention in prostate cancer (PCa) and paved the way for a greater understanding of these cryptic regulators in cancer. OBJECTIVE: To review current research exploring the functional biology of lncRNAs in PCa over the past three decades. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review was performed using PubMed to search for reports with terms "long noncoding RNA", "prostate", and "cancer" over the past 30 yr (1988-2018). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We comprehensively surveyed the literature collected and summarise experiments leading to the characterisation of lncRNAs in PCa. A historical timeline of lncRNA identification is described, where each lncRNA is categorised mechanistically and within the primary areas of carcinogenesis: tumour risk and initiation, tumour promotion, tumour suppression, and tumour treatment resistance. We describe select lncRNAs that exemplify these areas. We also review whether these lncRNAs have a clinical utility in PCa diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction, and as therapeutic targets. CONCLUSIONS: The biology of lncRNA is multifaceted, demonstrating a complex array of molecular and cellular functions. These studies reveal that lncRNAs are involved in every stage of PCa. Their clinical utility for diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction of PCa is well supported, but further evaluation for their therapeutic candidacy is needed. We provide a detailed resource and view inside the lncRNA landscape for other cancer biologists, oncologists, and clinicians. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we review current knowledge of the non-protein-coding genome in prostate cancer (PCa). We conclude that many of these regions are functional and a source of accurate biomarkers in PCa. With a strong research foundation, they hold promise as future therapeutic targets, yet clinical trials are necessary to determine their intrinsic value to PCa disease management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.762

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations130
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean UrologySame topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms researchFrench-language works237,207