MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Identifying the Ground-State NP Sheet through a Global Structure Search in Two-Dimensional Space and Its Promising High-Efficiency Photovoltaic Properties

2019· article· en· W2969656646 on OpenAlexaff
Yuanzheng Chen, Zebin Lao, Bai Sun, Xiaolei Feng, Simon A. T. Redfern, Hanyu Liu, Jian Lv, Hongyan Wang, Zhongfang Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Materials Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topic2D Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersDivision of Human Resource DevelopmentMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UK
KeywordsMaterials sciencePhotovoltaic systemHeterojunctionOptoelectronicsSolar cellBand gapPhosphoreneHoneycomb structureEnergy conversion efficiencyHoneycombPolymer solar cellOrganic solar cellNanotechnologyComposite materialPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently fabricated two-dimensional (2D) black phosphorene (BP) is considered to be a promising optoelectronic sheet, but its applications are hindered by the poor stability in air. Thus, it is desirable to investigate other BP-like 2D materials, which may have improved stability, while preserving the exceptional electronic properties of BP. Herein, using an efficient structure search method, we predicted a novel 2D BP-like material, namely, a honeycomb NP sheet (α-NP). Remarkably, its few-layer α-NP sheets possess not only a tunable direct bandgap under in-plane strain but also high mobility (×10 4 cm 2 V –1 s –1 ) and absorption coefficients (×10 5 cm –1 ). These advantageous characteristics endow the α-NP sheets as a very potential 2D material for efficient photovoltaic cell applications, as demonstrate by an estimated photovoltaic efficiency of ∼14%, when its thickness is at ∼1 μm. When combined with 2D MoTe 2, it can provide a type-II heterojunction solar cell with a conversion efficiency up to ∼16%. We also proposed a feasible strategy for mechanical cleavage to prepare the α-NP sheets from its bulk NP compound. Once prepared, the α-NP sheets may offer superior photovoltaic properties and facilitate the development of solar cells and optoelectronic devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Materials LettersSame topic2D Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207