MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969658825 · doi:10.1111/sed.12661

Significance of the chemistry and morphology of diagenetic siderite in clastic rocks of the Mesozoic Scotian Basin

2019· article· en· W2969658825 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Georgia Pe‐Piper, David J. W. Piper

Bibliographic record

VenueSedimentology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographyGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources CanadaSaint Mary's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffshore Energy Research AssociationDalhousie University
KeywordsSideriteGeologyDiagenesisClastic rockGlauconiteGeochemistryFeldsparMineralogySedimentary rockCarbonateIlliteAnkeriteCalciteClay mineralsQuartzPaleontologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Siderite (FeCO3) is a widespread minor diagenetic mineral in clastic sedimentary basins. Although eodiagenetic authigenesis of siderite is well‐known, siderite formed during burial diagenesis shows habits and chemical compositions that are poorly understood. This study tests the hypothesis that diagenetic siderite cements in sandstones in the Scotian Basin, offshore eastern Canada, show systematic variability in chemistry and habit that is a response to recrystallization and changing composition of basinal fluids. Mineral textures were determined from backscattered electron images, and chemistry mostly from electron microprobe analyses. Five chemical types of siderite are identified using k‐means cluster analysis, based on the amount of substitution of Ca, Mg and Mn for Fe. Eodiagenetic microcrystalline coated grains, concretions and intraclasts in sandstones are principally Fe‐rich siderite and locally have recrystallised to blocky equant crystals. Mesodiagenetic Mg‐rich siderite partly replaced these equant crystals and also framework mica and K‐feldspar grains, showing textural evidence for coupled dissolution–reprecipitation. Slender Mg‐rich siderite rhombs (lozenges, bladed or wheat‐seed siderite) have precipitated before and after the formation of quartz overgrowths in geochemical microenvironments. Magnesium substitution reflects Mg‐rich formation waters resulting from smectite to illite conversion. Equivalent Ca‐rich siderite occurs where sandstones overlie a Jurassic carbonate bank. Late Mn‐rich siderite has complex textures resembling those of Mississippi‐Valley type ores, with spheroidal rims, a honeycomb‐like mesh and concentric infill around secondary pores. It also occurs in veins or replacing intraclasts, post‐dating late ferroan‐calcite cements in sandstones that show strong dissolution by hot basinal brines. The Ca, Mg and Mn content of diagenetic siderite, coupled with textural evidence for recrystallization, can thus be used to track changes in ambient formation fluids. Siderite habits and chemistry described from the Scotian Basin are found in many clastic basins, suggesting that the observed recrystallization textures and variation in chemical type are of broad application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.419

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSedimentologySame topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207