MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969668495 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp.13251

Disability Theatre Manifesto

2019· article· en· W2969668495 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Emily Gray

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisability Rights and Representation
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsManifestoPresentation (obstetrics)ConversationMainstreamState (computer science)Product (mathematics)Queen (butterfly)Point (geometry)Disability studiesVisual artsSociologyArtPolitical scienceMedicineGender studiesComputer scienceLawCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For my thesis project, I have researched the current state of disability theatre in an effort to determine which practices are helpful or harmful to disability theatre. I have investigated: the inaccessibility of mainstream theatre, the connotations behind the word ‘disabled’, disability theatre’s past, disability theatre’s current state, who can play what role, professionalism in theatre, reviews, disclosures, methods to remove barriers, and calls to action. The end product of this research is an annotated manifesto that will be transformed into a presentation for Inquiry at Queen’s. The rationale behind this manifesto is to contribute to the conversation about barriers to the disabled community, and be a reference point for how theatre artists can be more inclusive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicDisability Rights and RepresentationFrench-language works237,207