MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969730641 · doi:10.1109/iccsre.2019.8807586

Arab Sign language Recognition with Convolutional Neural Networks

2019· article· en· W2969730641 on OpenAlexaff
Salma Hayani, Mohamed Benaddy, Othmane El Meslouhi, Mustapha Kardouchi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHand Gesture Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkRobustness (evolution)Support vector machineSign languageSign (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceMachine learningNatural language processingSpeech recognitionLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The implementation of an automatic recognition system for Arab sign language (ArSL) has a major social and humanitarian impact. With the growth of the deaf-dump community, such a system will help in integrating those people and enjoy a normal life. Like other languages, Arab sign language has many details and diverse characteristics that need a powerful tool to treat it. In this work, we propose a new system based on the convolutional neural networks, fed with a real dataset, this system will recognize automatically numbers and letters of Arab sign language. To validate our system, we have done a comparative study that shows the effectiveness and robustness of our proposed method compared to traditional approaches based on k-nearest neighbors (KNN) and support vector machines (SVM).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHand Gesture Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207