Early eukaryotic origins and metazoan elaboration of MAPR family proteins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background The membrane-associated progesterone receptor (MAPR) family consists of heme-binding proteins containing a cytochrome b 5 (cytb 5 ) domain characterized by the presence of a MAPR-specific interhelical insert region (MIHIR) between helices 3 and 4 of the canonical cytb5-domain fold. Animals possess three MAPR families (PGRMC-like, Neuferricin and Neudesin). Results Here we show that all animal MAPR families were already present in the common ancestor of the Opisthokonta (comprising animals and fungi as well as related protistan taxa). All three MAPR genes acquired extensions C-terminal to the cytb 5 domain, either before or with the evolution of animals. The archetypical MAPR protein, progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1), contains phosphorylated tyrosines Y139 and Y180. The combination of Y139/Y180 appeared in the common ancestor of Cnidaria and bilaterally symmetrical animals, along with an early embryological organizer and synapsed neurons, and is strongly conserved in all bilateral animals. A predicted protein interaction motif in the PGRMC1 MIHIR is potentially regulated by Y139 phosphorylation. A multilayered model of animal MAPR function acquisition includes some pre-metazoan functions (e.g., heme binding and cytochrome P450 interactions) and some acquired animal-specific functions that involve regulation of strongly conserved protein interaction motifs acquired by early-branching animals. Conclusions This study provides a conceptual framework for future studies, against which PGRMC1’s multiple functions can perhaps be stratified and functionally dissected. In accompanying papers we show that mutational perturbation of PGRMC1 phosphorylation status of the Y180 motif is associated with dramatic changes cell pasticity assayed by protein abundances, cell morphology, mitochondrial function, genomic stability, and epigenetic status, with pathways analysis associating Y180 mutation with processes related to organizer function. These combined works reveal previously unrecognized involvement of PGRMC1 in foundational animal processes of great relevance to disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".