MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969771960 · doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezz229

Corrigendum to ‘Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: a consensus report from the Uniportal VATS Interest Group (UVIG) of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS)’  [Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019;56:224–9]

2019· erratum· en· W2969771960 on OpenAlexaff
Luca Bertolaccini, Hasan Fevzi Batırel, Alessandro Brunelli, Diego González-Rivas, Mahmoud Ismail, Antonio Martin Ucar, Calvin S.H. Ng, Marco Scarci, Alan Sihoe, Paula A. Ugalde, Firas Abu Akar, Benedetta Bedetti, Sergio Bolufer Nadal, Jury Brandolini, Pierfilippo Crucitti, Attila Enyedi, Hiran C. Fernando, József Furák, Javier Gallego-Poveda, Carlos Galvez-Munos, Ivo Hanke, Luis Ángel Hernández-Arenas, Miroslav Janík, Peter Juhos, Lidia Libretti, Paolo Lucciarini, Paolo Macrì, Stefano Margaritora, Hamid Reza Mahoozi, Dania Nachira, Alessandro Pardolesi, Vadim Pischik, Dariusz Sagan, Hermien Schreurs, Dmitrii Sekhniaidze, Laura Socci, Davide Tosi, Akif Turna, Fernando Vannucci, Marcin Zieliński, Gaetano Rocco

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · 2019
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiothoracic surgeryVATS lobectomyInterest groupGeneral surgerySurgeryPneumonectomyInternal medicinePolitical scienceLung cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DOI of original article: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz133 In the originally published version of this article two co-authors names were missing: Luis Hernandez Arenas and Laura Socci. Their names have been added to the list of this corrigendum and also in the HTML version of this full article. The institution of Mahmoud Ismail has also changed since publication and is updated here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0700.041

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic SurgerySame topicLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207