Delay-Constrained Teleoperation Task Scheduling and Assignment for Human+Machine Hybrid Activities Over FiWi Enhanced Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the advent of semi-autonomous robotic assistance systems, their integration into human teams is starting to gain steam as part of the vision of human+machine hybrid activities. Unlike their fully autonomous counterparts, semi-autonomous robotic systems mainly rely on human assistance from time to time via teleoperation when human expertise is needed to accomplish a given task. As these robots will need to request human assistance via teleoperation, mapping these requests to human teleoperators stands as a difficult optimization problem. In this paper, after shedding some light on our envisioned FiWi enhanced network infrastructure and its role in realizing the emerging Tactile Internet, we formulate the problem of joint prioritized scheduling and assignment of delay-constrained teleoperation tasks to human operators with the objective to minimize the average weighted task completion time, maximum tardiness, and average operational expenditure (OPEX) per task. We then propose our context-aware prioritized scheduling and task assignment (CAPSTA) algorithm to achieve suitable trade-offs between the contradicting objectives of the problem. Further, to estimate the end-to-end packet delay of local and non-local teleoperation over FiWi enhanced networks, we develop our analytical framework, which flexibly allows for the coexistence of conventional human-to-human (H2H) and haptic human-to-machine (H2M) traffic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it