Application of Deng’s similarity-based analytic hierarchy process approach in parametric optimization of the electrical discharge machining process of SDK11 die steel
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents a hybrid Taguchi – analytic hierarchy process (AHP) – Deng’s similarity-based method for the multi-objective optimization of the electrical discharge machining process of SKD11. Among many parameters, the four most important parameters including current, voltage, pulse-on time, and pulse-off time are considered as control factors. The four quality characteristics including material removal rate, tool wear rate, surface roughness, hardness of machined surface, and white layer thickness were considered for simultaneous optimization. The hybrid Taguchi – AHP – Deng’s similarity-based multi-objective optimization was compared with several other methods to evaluate the effectiveness of this hybrid technique. The results show that the Taguchi – AHP – Deng’s similarity-based method is a good alternative to solve multi-objective optimization problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it