Torsional Energy Barriers of Biaryls Could Be Predicted by Electron Richness/Deficiency of Aromatic Rings; Advancement of Molecular Mechanics toward Atom-Type Independence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biaryl molecules are ubiquitous pharmacophores found in natural products and pharmaceuticals. In spite of this, existing molecular mechanics force fields are unable to accurately reproduce their torsional energy profiles, except for a few well-parametrized cases. This effectively limits the ability of structure-based drug design methods to correctly identify hits involving biaryls with confidence (e.g., during virtual screening, employing docking and/or molecular dynamics simulations). Continuing in our endeavor to quantify organic chemistry principles, we showed that the torsional energy profile of biaryl compounds could be computed on-the-fly based on the electron richness/deficiency of the aromatic rings. This method, called H-TEQ 4.0, was developed using a set of 131 biaryls. It was subsequently validated on a separate set of 100 diverse biaryls, including multisubstituted, bicyclic and tricyclic druglike molecules, and produced an average root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.95 kcal·mol –1 . For comparison, GAFF2 produced an RMSE of 3.88 kcal·mol –1, owing to problems associated with the transferability of torsion parameters. The success of H-TEQ 4.0 provided further evidence that force fields could transition to become atom-type independent, providing that the correct chemical principles are used. Overall, this method solved the problem of transferability of biaryl torsion parameters, while simultaneously improving the overall accuracy of the force field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".