MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969838907 · doi:10.33338/ef.84210

Reviews: Noctuid moths of Central Europe, A Natural History of the Ground-Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of America north of Mexico

2004· article· en· W2969838907 on OpenAlexaff
Matti Koivula

Bibliographic record

VenueEntomologica Fennica · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural historyGeographyBiologyEcologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rötschke, H. & Huber, K. 2003: Noctuid moths of Central Europe – an interactive identification tool on CD-ROM. Verlag für Interaktive Medien, Gaggenau. Can be purchased through http:// www.vim.de/. Price 99 EUR. Larochelle, A. & Lariviére, M.-C. 2003: A Natural History of the Ground-Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) ofAmerica north of Mexico. Pensoft, Sofia-Moscow. Pensoft Series Faunistica Nr. 27. ISSN 1312-0174, ISBN 954-642-165-0. Price USD 78.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEntomologica FennicaSame topicLepidoptera: Biology and TaxonomyFrench-language works237,207