MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Is PAX3-FOXO1 associated with worse outcome in adults with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS)?

2019· article· en· W2969902400 on OpenAlexaff
Sheena Guram, Julia Dirks, Shivali Barot, Anthony M. Griffin, Ilan Weinreb, Elizabeth G. Demicco, David Shultz, Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Rebecca A. Gladdy, Abha A. Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFOXO transcription factor regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkMount Sinai HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreHospital for Sick ChildrenLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAlveolar rhabdomyosarcomaPAX3RhabdomyosarcomaFusion geneInternal medicineOncologySarcomaPathologyBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e22525 Background: Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a rare soft tissue sarcoma in adults. The PAX3-FOXO1 fusion gene is associated with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. PAX3-FOXO1 results from a stable reciprocal translocation of chromosomes 2 and 13, which fuses in-frame the DNA binding domain of PAX3 with the transactivation domain of FOXO1. Occasionally, PAX7-FOXO1 is expressed. In children, the PAX3-FOXO1 fusion gene is associated with worse outcome. We evaluated the prognostic role of FOXO1 fusion status in adults with RMS treated in a single, large volume sarcoma centre. Methods: A retrospective review of adult RMS patients (pts) diagnosed from 1984 to 2018 was done. Information on demographics, treatment, fusion status and survival was collected. Primary favourable site was defined as tumour arising in orbit, non-bladder/prostate genitourinary system and non-parameningeal head and neck. Factors were compared using Fisher’s Exact test. Event-free survival (EFS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log rank test. FOXO1 fusion status was coded as FP (fusion positive) or FN (fusion negative). Results: Of 134 pts identified in our database, fusion testing was performed in 55 (41%). Of these, PAX3 fusion was detected in 22 (40%). PAX7 was not detected. The median age of FP and FN pts was 25 yrs (range 18, 90) and 27 yrs (range 18, 65), respectively. Gender distribution was similar between FP and FN. Favourable site was seen in 13 (60%) FP and 21 (64%) FN. Nodal disease was present in 21 (95%) FP and 21 (64%) FN (p = 0.02). Distant metastases were present in 10 (45%) FP and 9 (27%) FN (n.s.). Treatment received was as follows for FP and FN, respectively: chemotherapy (21(95%), 33(100%)), radiation (14(64%), 22(67%)) and surgery (4(18%), 17(52%)). 5-yr EFS for pts without distant metastases was 27% (CI 22.6-76.6) and 46% (CI 21.5 – 70.5) for FP and FN respectively (n.s.). Conclusions: FP and FN RMS occurs in adults of all ages. Similar to children, adults with FP are more likely to present with nodal disease. Our study did not show that fusion status was associated with poorer EFS in adult RMS, however, larger series are needed to confirm this preliminary data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicFOXO transcription factor regulationFrench-language works237,207