MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969910382 · doi:10.1111/jeu.12757

Phylogenetic Estimation of Community Composition and Novel Eukaryotic Lineages in Base Mine Lake: An Oil Sands Tailings Reclamation Site in Northern Alberta

2019· article· en· W2969910382 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Elisabeth Richardson, David Bass, Angela V. Smirnova, Lucas Paoli, Peter F. Dunfield, Joel B. Dacks

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Eukaryotic Microbiology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UK
KeywordsTailingsPhylumBiologyLand reclamationEnvironmental DNAEcologyThaumarchaeotaSurface mining18S ribosomal RNAPhylogenetic treeBiodiversityCoal miningPaleontologyCoalGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reclamation of anthropogenically impacted environments is a critical issue worldwide. In the oil sands extraction industry of Alberta, reclamation of mining-impacted areas, especially areas affected by tailings waste, is an important aspect of the mining life cycle. A reclamation technique currently under study is water-capping, where tailings are capped by water to create an end-pit lake (EPL). Base Mine Lake (BML) is the first full-scale end-pit lake in the Alberta oil sands region. In this study, we sequenced eukaryotic 18S rRNA genes recovered from 92 samples of Base Mine Lake water in a comprehensive sampling programme covering the ice-free period of 2015. The 565 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) generated revealed a dynamic and diverse community including abundant Microsporidia, Ciliata and Cercozoa, though 41% of OTUs were not classifiable below the phylum level by comparison to 18S rRNA databases. Phylogenetic analysis of five heterotrophic phyla (Cercozoa, Fungi, Ciliata, Amoebozoa and Excavata) revealed substantial novel diversity, with many clusters of OTUs that were more similar to each other than to any reference sequence. All of these groups are entirely or mostly heterotrophic, as a relatively small number of definitively photosynthetic clades were amplified from the BML samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score0.602

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Eukaryotic MicrobiologySame topicEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity StudiesFrench-language works237,207