MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969929356 · doi:10.3917/comla1.196.0055

Des fourmis , des papillons , des poissons , des sauterelles aux prises avec deux ethnologues de l’exposition

2018· article· fr· W2969929356 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication & langages · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsCanadian HeritageUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’étude du comportement des visiteurs dans l’exposition Vacances en France par Eliseo Verón et Martine Levasseur, publiée en 1983, a contribué à structurer le champ des recherches sur l’exposition, au moment où elle se présentait comme un nouvel objet d’étude. Leur approche se distancie des travaux qui se limitaient à l’analyse du dispositif uniquement, tout comme de ceux qui ne s’en tenaient qu’à l’observation empirique des visiteurs. Ils articulent dans un même cadre conceptuel l’intention des concepteurs aux stratégies d’appropriation des visiteurs, le dispositif de l’exposition jouant un rôle d’intermédiaire, de moyen terme, entre les deux. Ainsi, le comportement du visiteur peut être interprété comme le résultat d’une négociation entre les propriétés du discours proposé et les stratégies d’appropriation. Et la visite de l’exposition est conçue comme un moment d’interaction entre deux régimes de discours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.401
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.024 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it