Mechanism analysis of a flexible organic memristive memory with capacitance effect and negative differential resistance state
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been gradually realized that the sustainable electronic devices are of great prospects for sustainable applications in electronic technology products. From another point of view, a device with multiple physical performances would be a potential candidate for next generation multifunctional electronics. In this report, a flexible memory device based on sweet potato skin (SPS) was demonstrated, which presented a stable memory performance over 500 cycles and a large switching resistance ratio, and the current-voltage (I-V) hysteretic loop accompanied by capacitance effect and negative differential resistance state. In order to carry out detailed mechanism analysis, two materials (ITO or Ti) with different work functions as the bottom electrode and Ag as the top electrode were used to prepare two memristive devices. It can be confirmed that the conductive behavior obeys Schottky emission and direct tunneling at low voltage region, while it follows the hopping conduction at high voltage region. In a word, the selected SPS, a sustainable waste material, can be employed to prepare bioelectronic devices, which has a potential application value in green electronic products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".