MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

EXPANSÃO URBANA DE MACAPÁ, NO AMAPÁ: O CASO DA ZONA NORTE

2019· article· pt· W2969962284 on OpenAlexaff
Taís Oliveira de Morais, Ananda Brito Bastos, Robson Matheus de Araújo Silva, Daguinete Maria Chaves Brito

Bibliographic record

VenuePlaneta Amazônia Revista Internacional de Direito Ambiental e Políticas Públicas · 2019
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural and Food Sciences
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo objetiva analisar a expansão urbana de Macapá, Estado do Amapá, com destaque para a Zona Norte da cidade. Metodologicamente, utilizou-se a pesquisa bibliográfica e observações <em>in loco</em> para comparar a teoria a realidade local. Os resultados permitiram traçar uma análise da definição das tipologias de bairros, as diversas formas de ocupação territorial que vem ocorrendo na área, as consequências da falta de planejamento urbano na cidade, a falta de equipamentos urbanos e a degradação social e ambiental, além de traçar um perfil histórico-geográfico para a área, além de delinear um prognóstico da área de estudo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlaneta Amazônia Revista Internacional de Direito Ambiental e Políticas PúblicasSame topicAgricultural and Food SciencesFrench-language works237,207