MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2970041859 · doi:10.1097/mnm.0000000000001056

Combining 3′-Deoxy-3′-[18F] fluorothymidine and MRI increases the sensitivity of glioma volume detection

2019· article· en· W2970041859 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe Fernandez, Paolo Zanotti‐Fregonara, Sandrine Eimer, É. Gimbert, Pascal Monteil, Guillaume Penchet, F. Lamare, Paul Perez, Delphine Vimont, Sylvain Ledure, Thomas Tourdias, Hugues Loiseau

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Medicine Communications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGliomaSensitivity (control systems)Volume (thermodynamics)MedicineNuclear medicineNuclear magnetic resonanceCancer researchPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: 3'-Deoxy-3'-[18F] fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) is a marker of cell proliferation and displays a high tumor-to-background ratio in brain tumor lesions. We determined whether combining 18F-FLT PET and MRI study improves the detection of tumoral tissue compared to MRI alone and whether 18F-FLT uptake has a prognostic value by studying its association with histopathological features. METHODS: Thirteen patients with a supratentorial malignant glioma were recruited and scheduled for surgery. The tumor volume was defined in all patients on both 18F-FLT PET and MRI images. The images were coregistered and uploaded onto a neuronavigation system. During surgery, an average of 11 biopsies per patient were taken in regions of the brain that were positive to one or both imaging modalities, as well as from control peritumoral regions. The standardized uptake values (SUVs) of each biopsy region were correlated to histopathological data (i.e., proliferation index and number of mitoses) and the SUV values of high and low-grade samples were compared. RESULTS: Out of a total of 149 biopsies, 109 contained tumoral tissue at histopathological analysis. The positive predictive value was 93.1% for MRI alone and 78.3% for MRI and PET combined. In addition, 40% of the biopsy samples taken from areas of the brain that were negative at both PET and MRI had evidence of malignancy at pathology. The SUV values were not significantly correlated to either the proliferation index or the number of mitoses, and could not differentiate between high- and low-grade samples. CONCLUSION: In patients with newly diagnosed glioma, a combination of MRI and 18F-FLT-PET detects additional tumoral tissue and this may lead to a more complete surgical resection. Also, the addition of a negative PET to a negative MRI increases the negative predictive value. However, 18F-FLT still underestimated the margins of the lesion and did not correlate with histopathological features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNuclear Medicine CommunicationsSame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207