MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W297012442

Disseminative Characteristics of Poetry Embryology and Development/LES CARACTÉRISTIQUES COMMUNICATIVES DE LA POÉSIE DURANT SON APPARITION ET DÉVELOPPEMENT

2008· article· fr· W297012442 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yan-li Shao

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Text Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryLiteratureHumanitiesStyle (visual arts)ArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: This article attempts to discuss from the poetry embryology, to inquire about characteristics of the related information dissemination in the process of studying poetry literary style and poetry development, to clarify the relationship between the development and dissemination of poetry. As a result, it can offer new train of thought for understanding and solving some problems existing in the poetry. Key words: poetry, poetry embryology, dissemination Resume: Le present article tente de chercher, sous l'angle de l'embryologie de la poesie, les caracteristiques communicatives du genre poetique dans son apparition et developpement et illustre la relation entre le developpement de la poesie et la communication, dans le but d'offrir de nouvelles perspectives a pas mal de problemes dans la comprehension de la poesie. Mots-Cles: poesie, embryologie de la poesie, communication Poetry is one kind of artistic forms that appeared in the early period of human social life, and it is also one of the most important human artistic patterns, which plays a very active and deep function in the entire human social life. The embryology, development and maturity of any kind of literary styles must go through a long process, so does poetry. The dissemination of poetry arises together with the poetry activities. Therefore all kinds of behaviours related to poetry possess the disseminative characteristics to some extent. Professor Huang Shaoqing, the renowned expert in the field of poetry study, divides the history of poetry writing into six stages in his book History of Chinese Poetry Writing. The first stage belongs to the initial stage of poetry writing, which is also known as the primitive form of poetry writing. The second stage belongs to the stage of writing archaism poetry, which includes The Book of Poetry, The Odes of Ch'ii, Yuefu, etc, and it is also the pioneering stage for Chinese poetry writing. The third stage is the stage of writing modern-style poetry when poetry style gradually has its definite form. The fourth stage is the stage for the initial of Chinese poetry style, among which the writing of !iterator poem is very extrusive. The fifth stage is the sage for further of Chinese poetry style and the writing of San-Ch'u, which focuses on Xiaoling and Santao, occupies large part of poetry writing space. The sixth stage is the stage of writing modern poetry and it is an ultimate fission type of revolution in Chinese poetry writing history, in which great changes have taken places in forms and contents of poetry. Poetry styles do not confine to factors such as rules and forms of classical poem, etc, colloquialism becomes the trend in the language use and the contents become popularized step by step, which is making its great efforts to express the great changes of eras. As to the motives for the changes of poetry styles, Professor Huang Shaoqing points out the following reasons, that is, Most changes in poetry styles originate from people who are mothers that nurse and give birth to poetry styles. As Luxun once said that in my point of view, poem, poetry, lyrics and verse originated from people and !iterators just took them for their own use. We will find out, from the panoramic view of origination and change of certain poetry styles, from The Book of Poetry, The Odes of Ch'ii, Yuefu, to Song poetry, Yuan Verse, from Four-character Sentence Pattern, Five-character Sentence Pattern, to Lyrics, that all of the above-mentioned poetry styles originate from the folks, which can become a kind of relatively perfect poetry style only after !iterators absorbed, learned, processed and improved them. .... It is very important to do well in absorbing foreign nutrition and deal with theoretical conclusion, which will improve poetry style revolution and promote poetry writing quality. 2 Professor Huang Shaoqing's demonstration contains great values. He portrays the rough structure of Chinese poetry writing history, points out important reasons in the change of style in poetry writing, emphasizes on the function of cultural communication in the change of poetry styles and especially focuses on the key roles that foreign cultures have played in poetry styles. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicAdvanced Text Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207