MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2970129466 · doi:10.1029/2019jb017741

Modification of the Seismic Properties of Subducting Continental Crust by Eclogitization and Deformation Processes

2019· article· en· W2970129466 on OpenAlexaff
Sascha Zertani, Timm John, Frederik Tilmann, Hem Bahadur Motra, Ruth Keppler, Torgeir B. Andersen, Loïc Labrousse

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeomechanica (Canada)
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsGeologyEclogitizationSubductionGranuliteSeismic anisotropyCrustEclogiteSeismologyProtolithGeophysicsStructural geologyContinental crustContinental collisionPetrologyFaciesMantle (geology)TectonicsGeomorphologyOceanic crust

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Subduction zone processes and the resulting geometries at depth are widely studied by large‐scale geophysical imaging techniques. The subsequent interpretations are dependent on information from surface exposures of fossil subduction and collision zones, which help to discern probable lithologies and their structural relationships at depth. For this purpose, we collected samples from Holsnøy in the Bergen Arcs of western Norway, which constitutes a well‐preserved slice of continental crust, deeply buried and partially eclogitized during Caledonian collision. We derived seismic properties of both the lower crustal granulite‐facies protolith and the eclogite‐facies shear zones by performing laboratory measurements on cube‐shaped samples. P and S wave velocities were measured in three perpendicular directions, along the principal fabric directions of the rock. Resulting velocities agree with seismic velocities calculated using thermodynamic modeling and confirm that eclogitization causes a significant increase of the seismic velocity. Further, eclogitization results in decreased V P / V S ratios and, when associated with deformation, an increase of the seismic anisotropy due to the crystallographic preferred orientation of omphacite that were obtained from neutron diffraction measurements. The structural framework of this exposed complex combined with the characteristic variations of seismic properties from the lower crustal protolith to the high‐pressure assemblage provides the possibility to detect comparable structures at depth in currently active settings using seismological methods such as the receiver function method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207