MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2970140064 · doi:10.1109/icip.2019.8803300

Single Image Super-Resolution via Cascaded Parallel Multisize Receptive Field

2019· article· en· W2970140064 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKernel (algebra)Computer scienceConvolution (computer science)Image (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkImage resolutionComputer visionField (mathematics)SuperresolutionPattern recognition (psychology)Receptive fieldResolution (logic)Artificial neural networkMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recovering a High-Resolution (HR) image from a Low-Resolution (LR) image is the main concept of image Super-Resolution(SR). These days Convolution Neural Networks(CNN) have become very popular and efficient in generating HR image from a LR image. Although CNNs are widely used with great performance improvements, there is still much room for improvement. There has always been a trade-off between the number of parameters and performance enhancement. Inspired by the Inception architecture of GoogleNet, we have developed a novel approach with an efficiently increased number of receptive field by cascading different kernel sizes to reconstruct the HR image. Experimental results shows that the proposed model outperforms the state-of-art methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score0.615

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Image Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207