Climatological Features of the Weakly and Very Stably Stratified Nocturnal Boundary Layers. Part I: State Variables Containing Information about Regime Occupation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The atmospheric nocturnal stable boundary layer (SBL) can be classified into two distinct regimes: the weakly SBL (wSBL) with sustained turbulence and the very SBL (vSBL) with weak and intermittent turbulence. A hidden Markov model (HMM) analysis of the three-dimensional state-variable space of Reynolds-averaged mean dry static stability, mean wind speed, and wind speed shear is used to classify the SBL into these two regimes at nine different tower sites, in order to study long-term regime occupation and transition statistics. Both Reynolds-averaged mean data and measures of turbulence intensity (eddy variances) are separated in a physically meaningful way. In particular, fluctuations of the vertical wind component are found to be much smaller in the vSBL than in the wSBL. HMM analyses of these data using more than two SBL regimes do not result in robust results across measurement locations. To identify which meteorological state variables carry the information about regime occupation, the HMM analyses are repeated using different state-variable subsets. Reynolds-averaged measures of turbulence intensity (such as turbulence kinetic energy) at any observed altitude hold almost the same information as the original set, without adding any additional information. In contrast, both stratification and shear depend on surface information to capture regime transitions accurately. Use of information only in the bottom 10 m of the atmosphere is sufficient for HMM analyses to capture important information about regime occupation and transition statistics. It follows that the commonly measured 10-m wind speed is potentially a good indicator of regime occupation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".