MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2970233615 · doi:10.1029/2019tc005680

Cumulative and Coseismic (During the 2016 M<sub>w</sub>6.6 Aketao Earthquake) Deformation of the Dextral‐Slip Muji Fault, Northeastern Pamir Orogen

2019· article· en· W2970233615 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTectonics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftInnovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGeologySeismologySlip (aerodynamics)Fault (geology)AftershockSeismic gapSeismic hazardSinistral and dextralTectonicsActive faultElastic-rebound theory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Located at the northwestern syntaxis of the India‐Asia convergence zone, the Pamir orogen is characterized by complicated and strong active deformation. Constraining the detailed geometry and kinematics of major active structures is important both for understanding modern tectonic processes and for evaluating potential seismic hazards of the region. Our work focuses on the Muji Fault in the northeastern Pamir. Based on cumulative deformation recorded by landforms and coseismic deformation during the 2016 M w 6.6 Aketao earthquake, we determine the spatial extent, slip motion, fault‐plane geometry, and slip rate of the fault, on the basis of which we clarify its role in the modern tectonics of the Pamir and investigate its seismic behavior and associated seismic hazards. Our study indicates that (i) the Muji Fault, along with the Kongur Extensional System to its south, acts as a boundary fault that accommodates a relative divergence rate of 1.4–2.0°/Ma between the central‐western and eastern Pamir; (ii) geometric discontinuities along the fault exerted an important control on seismic rupture termination and slip gap formation during the Aketao earthquake; and (iii) the cumulative surface‐faulting deformation cannot be formed coseismically by repetitions of the Aketao earthquake, implying significant aseismic (postseismic and/or interseismic) creeping or possibly larger (approximately M w 7.2), surface‐faulting earthquakes. Our study highlights the usefulness of correlating cumulative and coseismic deformation patterns in active tectonic investigations and regional seismic hazard evaluations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it