MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2970253551 · doi:10.1520/gtj20170200

A Modified Oedometer Setup for Simultaneously Measuring Hydromechanical Stress-Strain Paths for Soils in the Unsaturated State

2019· article· en· W2970253551 on OpenAlexaffabout
Emad Maleksaeedi, Mathieu Nuth, Nana Momoh

Bibliographic record

VenueGeotechnical Testing Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOedometer testSiltGeotechnical engineeringSuctionSoil waterStress (linguistics)Atmospheric pressureCalibrationLateral earth pressureDeformation (meteorology)Water retentionDegree RankineVolume (thermodynamics)Pressure measurementMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceGeologyEngineeringMechanical engineeringSoil scienceComposite materialMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article reports a modified setup for an automatic oedometer apparatus that was designed at the Université de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada. The proposed setup can be used to simultaneously measure the superimposed volume change of a soil specimen caused by mechanical loading and suction imposition along with continuous measurement of water exchange. The combined use of air and water volume/pressure controllers allows the operator to use the axis translation technique to impose matric suction. The setup can also be used to carry out the conventional negative water column technique using a single burette or the water volume/pressure controller to apply suction within the range of 0 kPa to 25 kPa under atmospheric air pressure conditions. A modified Tempe cell was designed to ensure the airtightness of the cell and enhance the freedom of the specimens to move vertically during one-dimensional loading and soil-water retention tests, which is particularly of interest for practical cases in which accurate vertical deformation measurement (as low as 0.02 %) is required. Details of the calibration and test procedures are described and discussed. The test results of reconstituted specimens of a fine sand mixture and Ascot Corner silt are also presented to demonstrate the key features of the modified apparatus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeotechnical Testing JournalSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207