MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2970287931

Diagnostic fragmentation filtering for the global LC-HRMS/MS analysis of ergot alkaloids and indole–diterpenoids in Norwegian and Canadian Claviceps species

2019· dissertation· en· W2970287931 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kari Anne Pauchon

Bibliographic record

VenueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and fungal interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNorges Miljø- og Biovitenskapelige Universitet
KeywordsIndole testNorwegianClaviceps purpureaFragmentation (computing)ChemistryBiologyBotanyEcologyStereochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The understanding of the cereal disease caused by ergot (C. purpurea) is important with reference to wildlife and agriculture as ergot produces toxins. The sample set used in this study consisted of 66 Claviceps sclerotia from five distinct geographical locations: Eidsvoll, Larvik, Maridalen, Telemark (all in Norway) and Saskatchewan in Canada. Genotyping of the sclerotia revealed that the samples comprised of three Claviceps species: G1 (C. purpurea sensu lato), G2 (C. humidiphila) and G2a (C. arundinis). For screening and recognition of already classified and potentially novel toxins, diagnostic fragmentation filtering was applied for the extraction of the entire ergot alkaloid and indole-diterpenoid metabolome from the high-resolution mass spectrometry data. Principal component analysis and partial least squares revealed species-specific alkaloid patterns. G2a was found to be host specific.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.738
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo)Same topicPlant and fungal interactionsFrench-language works237,207