Pleasure is just the tip of the iceberg: Social representations, personal beliefs, and attributed meanings to partnered orgasm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Orgasm is highly symbolic and much personal, interpersonal, and sociocultural importance has been accorded to it. Given its significance, the absence of orgasm can be experienced as a source of personal distress and can also lead to relationship difficulties. However, previous orgasm research did not distinguish between cultural and intrapsychic orgasm scripts. The present study aimed to explore (1) how male and female orgasm are represented in Canadian culture (including Quebec culture); and (2) individuals’ beliefs, expectations, and ascribed meanings to orgasm in different-gender relationship contexts among a sample of women and men. Data from 27 interviews conducted among individuals in committed different-gender relationships (15 women, 11 men, 1 queer person; 21–68 years old), were analyzed using thematic analysis. Two overarching themes describing sociocultural representations of orgasm were developed: (1) Male sexual pleasure is innate/female sexual pleasure is acquired, and (2) Orgasm is part of (hetero)sex. Four main themes describing participants’ personal orgasm-related beliefs were also developed: (1) Orgasm is not part of (hetero)sex, (2) Orgasm is partner-dependent, (3) Orgasm is self-dependent, and (4) Orgasm is a dyadic experience. Many participants endorsed conflicting orgasm scripts and representations simultaneously. The data show several distinct, co-existing, yet conflicting prescriptive and gendered scripts, as well as personal responsibility and relationship discourses that are endorsed simultaneously by participants. This finding suggests shifts and developments in current sexual scripts. The present study’s findings can be used in future research examining sexual wellbeing and function, and relationship outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".