MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2970332631 · doi:10.1017/ice.2019.239

‘Chemical-free’ cleaning—Need for a closer look

2019· letter· en· W2970332631 on OpenAlexaff
Syed A. Sattar

Bibliographic record

VenueInfection Control and Hospital Epidemiology · 2019
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfection Control in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContent (measure theory)Action (physics)Computer scienceWorld Wide WebMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

light wand devices should only be used as an add-on technique after thorough cleaning and requires a prolonged application time for some bacterial species. No experiment showed a reduction >5 log 10 units defining disinfection. However, after cleaning, a low-level reduction may be acceptable because fewer CFU can be expected on the surface than in our experiment. The light wand device can also be used as an extra disinfection after terminal cleaning and disinfection for complex surfaces (eg, buttons of the endotracheal suction system), as shown by Wendel et al. 6 Additional material degradation testing is needed before air worthiness approval in an air ambulance. Occupational safety regulations regarding UV-C use need to be observed with manual application procedures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInfection Control and Hospital EpidemiologySame topicInfection Control in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207