MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2970351258 · doi:10.7860/jcdr/2019/40173.12975

Food Intake Evaluation in a Group of Elite Track and Field Athletes

2019· article· en· W2970351258 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle metabolism and nutrition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrack and field athleticsEliteAthletesElite athletesFood intakeTrack (disk drive)MedicinePsychologyPhysical therapyInternal medicinePolitical scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Eating behaviours and nutritional status are key factors related to individuals’ health. In athletes, diet optimisation has a key role in training adaptation achievement, injury prevention and good health status maintenance. However, nowadays it is still common to find diet behaviours not optimised with an increased risk of energy/nutrients deficiencies that can result not only in performance impairment but also in increased injury frequencies and malnutrition. Aim: To evaluate food intakes of elite track and field athletes to evaluate the adequacy of their diet. Materials and Methods: A total of 24 healthy elite track and field athletes, aged 18-30 years participated in the study. Anthropometric measurements were performed (weight, height, body circumferences, skinfold thickness) and Food Habits were evaluated using a seven days-food diary. Data were analysed through the WinFood® software, to obtain information about the basal metabolic rate and the energy expenditure of subjects. Moreover, information about macro and micro-nutrients were obtained both as percentage and grams. Statistical analysis was carried out in order to evaluate difference between male and female and between studied group’s intakes and international nutritional guidelines (The International Society of Sport Nutrition (ISSN)’s guidelines and the Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Dietitians of Canada, and the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) on Nutrition and Athletic Performance). Results: From the analysis, it was observed that energy expenditure resulted higher than the caloric intake. On average, there was a difference of about 30% between the energy expenditure and the caloric intake. The amount of macronutrients daily assumed by athletes was lower than values suggested by the major international society of sport in case of carbohydrates especially in female. Proteins intake resulted to be adequate, on the other hand, lipids intake were higher than recommendations above all in female. Furthermore, athletes did not assume adequate intakes of the most important micronutrients respect to the values suggested by guidelines especially for Calcium both in male and female and Iron in female. Conclusion: These results underline the importance of nutritional education programs and of nutritional practitioner in order to optimise the diet with proper intakes of macro and micro-nutrients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.376
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it