Apport potentiel des cours théoriques à la pratique réflexive en formation à l’enseignement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Notre recherche analyse le contenu prescrit de cours théoriques afin de tenter d’identifier leur potentiel de contribution à la pratique réflexive des étudiants en formation à l’enseignement. Les cours sont ici vus comme autant d’occasions d’apport de savoirs qui pourraient nourrir la pratique réflexive des étudiants, mais aussi comme autant d’axes de préoccupations qui leur sont proposés afin d’orienter leurs analyses. À partir d’une conceptualisation fondée sur une relecture de la réflexivité, une analyse de contenu des canevas de cours a été faite à l’aide d’une matrice fondée sur une modélisation croisant des sujets de préoccupation abordés ou systèmes de régulation, avec des champs d’investigation ou empans réflexifs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.035 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".