MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2970396173 · doi:10.19184/geosi.v4i2.10849

THE EFFECTIVENESS COMPARISON BETWEEN INQUIRY AND PROBLEM BASED LEARNING TOWARDS GEOGRAPHY LEARNING OUTCOMES

2019· article· en· W2970396173 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeosfera Indonesia · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSTEM Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationProblem-based learningClass (philosophy)Nonprobability samplingData collectionPopulationDiscovery learningSample (material)Test (biology)Sample size determinationQuasi-experimentSubject (documents)Research designPsychologyComputer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatisticsSociologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to determine the differences of learning outcomes between students that were performed using inquiry and student who were applied using problem based learning in classes of X SMA 2 Plakat Tinggi. This study also purposes to examine the effectiveness comparison between problem based learning and inquiry method. The research engages quantitative research with quasi-experimental type. Subject selection conducts match design. The population of this study were students of class X IPS in SMA 2 Plakat Tinggi which composed of three classes. The sample selection in this study engaged purposive sampling, hereby X IPS 3 was elected as experimental group 1 (Problem based learning) and class X IPS 1 as the experimental group 2 (Inquiry) class. Data collection technique performed in this study was learning outcomes in the form of written test. Data analysis technique was engaging independent sample t-test, which was followed by N increased and effect size extent. The findings are differences of learning outcomes improvement between students who studied utilizing inquiry method and students who were taught using problem based learning method. Problem based learning is more effective than inquiry in promoting Geography learning outcomes. This is indicated through calculation result upon effect size extent, where students who were taught using problem based learning method obtain a value of 4.185, larger compared to those who were treated using inquiry method which obtain a value of 3.462. Keywords: Inquiry, problem based learning, Geography References Agustini, D. M. (2017). PBL untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Tunarungu Kelas IV A SLBN 2 Bantul. Widia Ortodidaktika, 6(4), 427-437. Alberta. (2004). Focus on Inquiry: A Teacher’s Guide to Implementing Inquiry Based Learning. Canada: Learning Resources Centre. Barret, T., & Moore, S. (2010). New Approaches to: Problem based learning Reveitalising Your Practice in Higher Education. New York: Routledge. Blessinger, P., & Carfora, J. M. (Eds.). (2014). Inquiry-based learning for the arts, humanities and social sciences: A conceptual and practical resource for educators. Emerald Group Publishing. Bridges, S., McGrath, C., & Whitehill, T. L. (Eds.). (2012). Problem-based learning in clinical education: The next generation (Vol. 8). Springer Science & Business Media. Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2017). 21st Century Skills Development Through Inquiry-Based Learning. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-2481-8 Cohen J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic. Duran, M., & Dokme, L. (2016). The Effect of the Inquiry Based Learning Approach on Student’s Critical Thinking Skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(12), 2887-2908. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02311a. Friesen, S., & David, S. (2013). Inquiry Based Learning Review. Calgary: University of Calgary. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312592892_Inquiry-Based_Learning_A_Review_of_the_Research_Literature. Goodman, D. (2018). Problem-Based Learning in the MPA Curiculum. Journal of Public Affrairs Education, 14(2), 253-270. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40215813. Grady, G.O., Elaine H.J.Y., Karen, P.L.G., & Henk, G.S. (2012).One Day One Problem an Approach to Problem Based Learning. Singapore: Springer. Handoyono, N.A. (2016). Pengaruh Inquiry Learning Dan Problem-Based Learning terhadap Hasil Belajar PKKR Ditinjau dari Motivasi Belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 6(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v6i1.8114. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?. Educational psychology review, 16(3), 235-266. McKeown, T. R., Abrams, L. M., Slattum, P. W., & Kirk, S. V. (2015). Enhancing Teacher Beliefs through an Inquiry-Based Professional Development Program. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 2(1), 85. doi:10.21891/jeseh.30143 Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. doi:10.1002/tea.20347 Mundilarto. (2013). Keefektifan Pembelajaran Inquiry Based Learning untuk Peningkatan Karakter Siswa pada Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan. Retrieved from https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/download/1483/pdf. Seng, T.O. (2009). Problem Based Learningand Creativty. Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd. Simone, C.D. (2014). Problem Based Learning in Teacher Education: Trajectories of Change. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(12).Retrieved from http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_4_No_12_October_2014/3.pdf. Smith, R.S., & Walker, R. (2010). Can Inquiry-Based Learning Strengthen the Links between Teaching and Disciplinary Research? Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 723-740. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903315502. Sumaatmadja, N. (2001). Metode Pengajaran Geografi. Jakarta: BumiAksara. Suprijono, A. (2015). Cooperative Learning Teori & Aplikasi Paikem. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Trianto. (2010). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu: Konsep, Strategi, dan Implementasinya dalamKurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Unver, A.O., & Sertac, A. (2011).Ovierviews on Inquiry Based and Problem Based Learning Methods. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Science, 303-309. Retrieved from http://webb.deu.edu.tr/baed/giris/baed/ozel_sayi/303-310.pdf. Warner, R.M. (2008). Applied Statistic. USA: Sage Publications. Westwood, P.S. (2008).What the Teacher Need to Know About Teaching Methods. Camberwell, V: Acer Press. Whitcombe S.W. (2013) Problem-based Learning Students’ Perceptions of Knowledge and Professional Identity: Occupational Therapists as ‘Knowers’, British Journal of Occupational Therapy,76(1), 37-42 Wijayanti, A., & Wulandari, T. (2016). Efektivitas Model CTL dan Model PBL terhadap Hasil Belajar IPS. Harmoni Sosial: Jurnal Pendidikan IPS, 3(2), 112. doi:10.21831/hsjpi.v3i2.7908 Yew, E.H.J., & Karen, G. (2016). Problem-Based Learning: An Overview of its Process and Impact on Learning. Journal Health Professions Education, 2(2), 75-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.004\. Yuniawati. (2016). Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran PPKN Melalui Penerapan Problem Based Learning di SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan IPS. Retrieved from https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/hsjpi/article/view/7947/8576. Copyright (c) 2019 Geosfera Indonesia Journal and Department of Geography Education, University of Jember This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share A like 4.0 International License

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it