MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2970396173 · doi:10.19184/geosi.v4i2.10849

THE EFFECTIVENESS COMPARISON BETWEEN INQUIRY AND PROBLEM BASED LEARNING TOWARDS GEOGRAPHY LEARNING OUTCOMES

2019· article· en· W2970396173 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueGeosfera Indonesia · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSTEM Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMathematics educationProblem-based learningClass (philosophy)Nonprobability samplingData collectionPopulationDiscovery learningSample (material)Test (biology)Sample size determinationQuasi-experimentSubject (documents)Research designPsychologyComputer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatisticsSociologyChemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This study aims to determine the differences of learning outcomes between students that were performed using inquiry and student who were applied using problem based learning in classes of X SMA 2 Plakat Tinggi. This study also purposes to examine the effectiveness comparison between problem based learning and inquiry method. The research engages quantitative research with quasi-experimental type. Subject selection conducts match design. The population of this study were students of class X IPS in SMA 2 Plakat Tinggi which composed of three classes. The sample selection in this study engaged purposive sampling, hereby X IPS 3 was elected as experimental group 1 (Problem based learning) and class X IPS 1 as the experimental group 2 (Inquiry) class. Data collection technique performed in this study was learning outcomes in the form of written test. Data analysis technique was engaging independent sample t-test, which was followed by N increased and effect size extent. The findings are differences of learning outcomes improvement between students who studied utilizing inquiry method and students who were taught using problem based learning method. Problem based learning is more effective than inquiry in promoting Geography learning outcomes. This is indicated through calculation result upon effect size extent, where students who were taught using problem based learning method obtain a value of 4.185, larger compared to those who were treated using inquiry method which obtain a value of 3.462. Keywords: Inquiry, problem based learning, Geography References Agustini, D. M. (2017). PBL untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Tunarungu Kelas IV A SLBN 2 Bantul. Widia Ortodidaktika, 6(4), 427-437. Alberta. (2004). Focus on Inquiry: A Teacher’s Guide to Implementing Inquiry Based Learning. Canada: Learning Resources Centre. Barret, T., & Moore, S. (2010). New Approaches to: Problem based learning Reveitalising Your Practice in Higher Education. New York: Routledge. Blessinger, P., & Carfora, J. M. (Eds.). (2014). Inquiry-based learning for the arts, humanities and social sciences: A conceptual and practical resource for educators. Emerald Group Publishing. Bridges, S., McGrath, C., & Whitehill, T. L. (Eds.). (2012). Problem-based learning in clinical education: The next generation (Vol. 8). Springer Science & Business Media. Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2017). 21st Century Skills Development Through Inquiry-Based Learning. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-2481-8 Cohen J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic. Duran, M., & Dokme, L. (2016). The Effect of the Inquiry Based Learning Approach on Student’s Critical Thinking Skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(12), 2887-2908. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02311a. Friesen, S., & David, S. (2013). Inquiry Based Learning Review. Calgary: University of Calgary. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312592892_Inquiry-Based_Learning_A_Review_of_the_Research_Literature. Goodman, D. (2018). Problem-Based Learning in the MPA Curiculum. Journal of Public Affrairs Education, 14(2), 253-270. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40215813. Grady, G.O., Elaine H.J.Y., Karen, P.L.G., & Henk, G.S. (2012).One Day One Problem an Approach to Problem Based Learning. Singapore: Springer. Handoyono, N.A. (2016). Pengaruh Inquiry Learning Dan Problem-Based Learning terhadap Hasil Belajar PKKR Ditinjau dari Motivasi Belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 6(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v6i1.8114. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?. Educational psychology review, 16(3), 235-266. McKeown, T. R., Abrams, L. M., Slattum, P. W., & Kirk, S. V. (2015). Enhancing Teacher Beliefs through an Inquiry-Based Professional Development Program. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 2(1), 85. doi:10.21891/jeseh.30143 Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. doi:10.1002/tea.20347 Mundilarto. (2013). Keefektifan Pembelajaran Inquiry Based Learning untuk Peningkatan Karakter Siswa pada Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan. Retrieved from https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/download/1483/pdf. Seng, T.O. (2009). Problem Based Learningand Creativty. Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd. Simone, C.D. (2014). Problem Based Learning in Teacher Education: Trajectories of Change. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(12).Retrieved from http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_4_No_12_October_2014/3.pdf. Smith, R.S., & Walker, R. (2010). Can Inquiry-Based Learning Strengthen the Links between Teaching and Disciplinary Research? Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 723-740. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903315502. Sumaatmadja, N. (2001). Metode Pengajaran Geografi. Jakarta: BumiAksara. Suprijono, A. (2015). Cooperative Learning Teori & Aplikasi Paikem. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Trianto. (2010). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu: Konsep, Strategi, dan Implementasinya dalamKurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Unver, A.O., & Sertac, A. (2011).Ovierviews on Inquiry Based and Problem Based Learning Methods. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Science, 303-309. Retrieved from http://webb.deu.edu.tr/baed/giris/baed/ozel_sayi/303-310.pdf. Warner, R.M. (2008). Applied Statistic. USA: Sage Publications. Westwood, P.S. (2008).What the Teacher Need to Know About Teaching Methods. Camberwell, V: Acer Press. Whitcombe S.W. (2013) Problem-based Learning Students’ Perceptions of Knowledge and Professional Identity: Occupational Therapists as ‘Knowers’, British Journal of Occupational Therapy,76(1), 37-42 Wijayanti, A., & Wulandari, T. (2016). Efektivitas Model CTL dan Model PBL terhadap Hasil Belajar IPS. Harmoni Sosial: Jurnal Pendidikan IPS, 3(2), 112. doi:10.21831/hsjpi.v3i2.7908 Yew, E.H.J., & Karen, G. (2016). Problem-Based Learning: An Overview of its Process and Impact on Learning. Journal Health Professions Education, 2(2), 75-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.004\. Yuniawati. (2016). Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran PPKN Melalui Penerapan Problem Based Learning di SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan IPS. Retrieved from https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/hsjpi/article/view/7947/8576. Copyright (c) 2019 Geosfera Indonesia Journal and Department of Geography Education, University of Jember This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share A like 4.0 International License

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,021
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,331
Écart entre enseignants0,306 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle