MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2970517786 · doi:10.1615/thmt-18.1050

Heat transfer in a fixed bed of particles for energy storage: a multi-scale numerical study

2018· article· en· W2970517786 on OpenAlexaff
M. Belot, Thanh-Tong Phan, Florian Euzenat, J-L. Pierson, David Teixeira, Guillaume Vinay, Quentin Falcoz, Adrien Toutant, Anthony Wachs

Bibliographic record

VenueProceeding of THMT-18. Turbulence Heat and Mass Transfer 9 Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium On Turbulence Heat and Mass Transfer · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompressed air energy storageThermal energy storageHeat transferEnergy storageMechanicsAdiabatic processRenewable energyIntermittencyDiscrete element methodMaterials sciencePorosityParticle (ecology)Environmental scienceProcess engineeringThermodynamicsPower (physics)PhysicsEngineeringTurbulenceElectrical engineeringGeologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electricity storage, like Advanced Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage (AA-CAES), is a potential solution to address the problem of intermittency of renewable power sources. AA-CAES stores not only the compressed air, but also the heat released upon compression of the air, in a Thermal Energy Storage (TES) system which plays a prevailing role in the global efficiency of AA-CAES process. At IFP Energies nouvelles, we develop TES systems based on fixed bed reactors to store heat in particles. The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of different parameters (porosity, particulate Reynolds number, presence of walls) on heat transfers within the bed thanks to different numerical approaches at different scales: at the particle scale using Particle Resolved Simulation (Fictitious Domain / Discrete Element Methods (DEM) or body-fitted approach), at a small bed of particles scale (DEM-CFD model) or at the full bed scale (Continuous Porous Media model).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceeding of THMT-18. Turbulence Heat and Mass Transfer 9 Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium On Turbulence Heat and Mass TransferSame topicHeat and Mass Transfer in Porous MediaFrench-language works237,207