MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2970519405 · doi:10.1109/mele.2019.2925765

The Missing Health Link: How a transition to electrified vehicles may benefit more than just the environment

2019· article· en· W2970519405 on OpenAlexaff
Sloane Kowal, Abhay Dhand, Himanshi Khurana, Afreen Ahmad, Ali Emadi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Electrification Magazine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEnvironmental healthCardiovascular healthAsthmaDiseaseParticulatesIntensive care medicinePathologyInternal medicineBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Worldwide, more than 1 billion vehicles are used regularly, with the majority being gasoline powered. These transport methods are known emitters of carbon dioxide, particulate matter (PM), and other pollutants (i.e., nitric oxides). Such compounds pose a great environmental risk, but recent research has also suggested health consequences. PM, a microscopic carcinogenic substance, affects many biological systems and has been associated with medical concerns in clinical and laboratory settings. In clinical settings, research on the effects of PM of 25 pm or lower in diameter (PM25) have focused on interactions with the cardiovascular, respiratory, and nervous systems. Vulnerable populations (i.e., the elderly and hospitalized patients) disproportionately experience an increase in cardiovascular and respiratory deaths along with hospital admissions for heart disease and asthma. Also, studies have found an increase in tumorigenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0070.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Electrification MagazineSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207