Burden and Standard of Proof in Election Petitions without Criminal Allegations
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
The three-model screen
all 1,000 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Legal argument about burden and standard of proof in election petitions; 'evidence' and 'proof' here are legal, not research, concepts.
The paper analyzes legal standards of proof in election petitions.
Legal analysis of burden of proof in election petitions; electoral law, not research practice.
Abstract
The burden and standard of proof in election petition without criminal allegation is in tandem with the extant Evidence Act, as election petitions is sui generis. The purpose of election laws is to obtain a correct expression of the intent of the voters. However, this paper argues that whereas proof of election petition without criminal allegations requires proof on the preponderance of evidence, the shallow chant of “he who asserts must prove” in the extant law is a conduit pipe for electoral injustice. This paper therefore makes a clarion call for the amendment of the relevant extant law to usher in a legal regime of burden of proof on the pleadings, where whoever asserts the affirmative or positive must prove on the state of the pleadings. The rebuttable presumption of the regularity of the conduct of elections and declaration of results, no longer serve the end of justice in our electoral process. This paper therefore argues that the Electoral Act be amended to place the burden of proof of the regularity of elections and declaration of results on the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), to meet the desired justice contemplated in the electoral process.
Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.
The record
- Venue
- Journal of Politics and Law
- Topic
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies
- Field
- Social Sciences
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- AllegationLawDeclarationExtant taxonReasonable doubtPresumptionPolitical scienceEconomic JusticeBurden of proofElection lawLaw and economicsSociologyDemocracy
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes