MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2970553439 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggz396

3-D attenuation tomography from microseismicity in a mine

2019· article· en· W2970553439 on OpenAlexafffund
Himanshu Barthwal, Frank J. Calixto, Mirko van der Baan

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersMicroseismic Industry Consortium
KeywordsGeologyMicroseismSeismologyAttenuationGeophoneInversion (geology)TomographySeismic waveAmplitudeMoment magnitude scaleSeismic tomographyGeodesyMineralogyMantle (geology)GeophysicsTectonicsGeometryOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY We perform 3-D attenuation tomography using microseismic data recorded during an underground mine development. The whole path attenuation parameter t* is obtained by least-squares inversion of P-wave amplitude spectra of the events recorded by 7 monitoring wells each containing 4 3C geophones. The corner frequencies obtained during P-wave spectral inversion of the 488 identified events range from 140 to 220 Hz which are typical for microseismic events with a negative moment magnitude of around –1. The quality factor Q obtained from tomographic inversion varies between 9 and 72 with the event cluster location characterized by a low Q value of 10. Two high Q regions of 30–72 are located at depths of 0.45 and 0.5 km, one between 0–0.15 km east and 0.3–0.5 km north which correlate with the high-grade ore deposit, and another centred around 0.45 km east and 0.25 km north. The high (-low) Q values, in general, correlates with the high (-low) velocities present in the velocity tomography model. A joint interpretation of seismic attenuation and velocity models reveals the heterogeneity present in the mine which aids in delineating the ore body using seismic waves in addition to other measurements such as gravity inversion and direct sampling from drillholes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207