MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Investigating the Efficacy of Anti-CD200 Immunotherapy in MRD Low and Risk B Cell Precursor ALL

2017· article· en· W2970632109 on OpenAlexaff
Paraskevi Diamanti, Saifurrizal Saifurrizal, Charlotte V. Cox, Penka S. Petrova, Robert A. Uger, Allison Blair

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsTrillium Therapeutics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinimal residual diseaseAntigenImmunologyPopulationCD19MedicineImmunotherapyCancer researchImmune systemChimeric antigen receptorOncologyInternal medicineLeukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Despite remission rates of >90% in childhood B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (BCP ALL) using frontline treatment, the incidence of relapse remains high. Immunotherapeutic approaches, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells targeting CD19 have resulted in improved outcomes for refractory cases. However, such therapies do not target CD19- ALL cells, a population known to have leukaemia initiating ability, and there are several reports of patients relapsing with CD19- leukaemia after CAR-T cell therapy. CD200 (OX-2) is an immunosuppressive molecule overexpressed in BCP ALL. In low risk minimal residual disease (MRD) ALL samples, only CD200+ cells have leukaemia initiating capacity in NOD.Cg- Prkdcscid Il2r g tm1Wjl /Sz (NSG) mice, suggesting that CD200 may be a suitable target for therapy in these cases. When CD200 binds to its receptor (CD200R) the immune response is suppressed. Consequently, malignant cells that overexpress CD200 may capitalise on this immune suppression and avoid destruction. Anti-CD200 antibodies (Ab) may be used to prevent such cancer cell evasion by binding to CD200 antigen and blocking its interaction with CD200R. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of CD200 in MRD low and risk BCP ALL cases and assess the effects of using monoclonal (Mo) TTI-CD200 Ab in vitro and in vivo. Samples from MRD low and risk BCP ALL cases were stained with anti-CD200 Ab to quantify (i) the proportion of cells expressing CD200, (ii) the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CD200 and (iii) the number of CD200 antigen binding sites. Results were compared to those obtained using normal bone marrow (NBM) controls. The proportion of CD200+ cells was higher in ALL cases (median 40.0%, range 5.4-74.4%) compared to NBM cells (median 0.001%, range 0-0.003%, P =0.0004). There was no significant difference between the MRD low (median 33.8%, range 18.1-74.1%) and risk (median 44.93%, range 36.35-74.4%) ALL cases. However, CD200 MFI levels were significantly higher in the low risk cases (median 593, range 469-1313) compared to those observed in MRD risk cases (median 191, range 138-572, P =0.04). CD200 MFI levels in the low risk group were also significantly higher than in NBM cells (median 0.9, range 0-27, P =0.001). Additionally, the number of CD200 antigen sites on ALL cells was 5-fold higher in MRD low risk cases (median 1372, range 324-2179) than in risk cases (median 264, range 87-1500), while the number of CD200 sites on BM cells was only 17 (range 13-112, P =0.006 vs low risk cases). Monocyte-derived macrophages and CD4+ T cells from healthy donors were cultured with low risk BCP ALL cells ± TTI-CD200 in a mixed lymphocyte reaction assay. The production of interleukin (IL)-2 was measured as an indicator of immune system activation using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Median CD200 expression in these cases was 46.9% (range 0.7-94.2%) and MFI was 249 (34.8-1659). The median IL-2 increase observed on addition of TTI-CD200 was 16-fold (range 1.7-120) and it did not correlate with the proportion of CD200+ cells or MFI. In these cases, samples with very low proportions of CD200+ cells (0.9±0.4%) demonstrated a 2.5-fold increase in IL-2, whereas samples with higher proportions of CD200+ cells (91.1±4.4%) produced a 17.2-fold rise. To assess the effects of TTI-CD200 on ALL cells in vivo, NSG were inoculated with BCP ALL cells from MRD low and risk cases. Once leukaemia levels exceeded 0.5% in peripheral blood, animals received 4 doses of TTI-CD200 (20mg/kg i.v.) over 10 days. Consistent with previous findings, TTI-CD200 treatment of mice engrafted with MRD risk cases had no effect on disease burden. This may be due to the lower proportion of CD200+ cells in these cases (34.1±11.7% CD200+) and also that CD200- cells contribute to engraftment in risk cases. In contrast, in low risk ALL cases a 47.5±29% reduction in leukaemia burden was observed after treatment with TTI-CD200. The proportion of inoculated CD200+ cells was higher in these low risk cases (74.9±30.3% CD200+) and had significantly reduced by 99.4±0.6% (P =0.04) in ALL cells recovered from the murine BM on termination. The dose and schedule of TTI-CD200 used was much less intensive than standard chemotherapy. It may be possible to improve the in vivo efficacy using another round of therapy. These findings demonstrate the potential of using anti-CD200 MoAb therapy for low risk BCP ALL. Disclosures Petrova: Trillium Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Uger: Trillium Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207