MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2970648067 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2019.2938732

An Adaptive Data Acquisition and Clustering Technique to Enhance the Speed of Spherical Near-Field Antenna Measurements

2019· article· en· W2970648067 on OpenAlexafffund
Rezvan Rafiee Alavi, Rashid Mirzavand, John Doucette, Pedram Mousavi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsCluster analysisAdaptive samplingInterpolation (computer graphics)Sampling (signal processing)Computer scienceAntenna (radio)EllipsoidAlgorithmSpline interpolationData acquisitionSpline (mechanical)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter presents a new approach for adaptive spherical near-field (NF) antenna measurement. The proposed method begins with a number of initial points and sequentially focuses on the areas with a highly dynamic NF pattern. Thereafter, the source reconstruction method is utilized to calculate the equivalent magnetic and electric currents on the surface of an ellipsoid that encompasses an antenna under test. The equivalent sources are used to compute the far-field pattern of the antenna. The comparison of the adaptive algorithm with the uniform sampling indicates that the number of the required samples is decreased significantly using the adaptive method. The adaptive data acquisition can also be used in case of uniform sampling to remove the redundant samples and accelerate the source reconstruction method. Since the newly added point is not necessarily laid on the measurement points, the cubic spline interpolation technique is employed to compute the value of the field. Besides, a machine learning algorithm based on k-means clustering is applied to the uniformly sampled data to determine different clusters of data. Thus, for every new point, the cluster to which the data point belongs can be determined, and only the values of that cluster are used to calculate the value of the new point.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation LettersSame topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207