MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2970691943 · doi:10.5944/empiria.44.2019.25355

El impulso de las políticas de participación en la política local del País Valencià: confusiones y derivas

2019· article· es· W2970691943 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEmpiria Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Las elecciones municipales del 2015 supusieron, en el contexto del País Valencià, un impulso a la política de participación. Tras las elecciones, estas intenciones se materializaron en la consideración institucional de órganos como las concejalías de participación, áreas o servicios. Es desde esta toma de conciencia que la Cátedra Gobierno Abierto, Participación Ciudadana y Open Data promovida por la Conselleria de Transparencia, Responsabilidad Social, Participación y Cooperación de la Generalitat Valenciana y la Universitat de València, se plantea llevar a cabo una investigación cualitativa que nos ofrezca información sobre los procesos de inclusión e impulso de la participación ciudadana en las políticas sociales del ámbito local. En este artículo presentamos los resultados del ejercicio analítico que hemos llevado a cabo en el marco de esta investigación cualitativa: comparar los discursos sobre el impulso de las políticas de participación en el ámbito local provenientes de los agentes institucionales (lo que hemos llamado la participación institucional), con los preceptos básicos del método IAP. La investigación que presentamos aquí tuvo, desde su origen, la mirada puesta en la Comunidad Autónoma como unidad de análisis. Se han realizado 15 entrevistas semi-estructuradas a responsables locales de las áreas de participación ciudadana en los ayuntamientos de las provincias de Castellón, Alicante y Valencia. El análisis del material cualitativo apunta a algunas barreras y confusiones, tanto en lo referente al propio concepto de participación como a la falta de anclaje con los preceptos de la IAP en tanto que método que afloran como limitaciones para la implantación de políticas de participación a nivel local. La conclusión que se puede extraer apunta a la necesidad de articulación de un modelo de participación para el País Valencià.The municipal elections of 2015 gave a boost, in País Valencià, to the participation policy. In the agendas of the parties of the entire ideological spectrum, the need to activate citizen participation and transparency was mentioned. After the elections, these intentions materialized in the institutional consideration of bodies such as the councils of participation, areas or services. It is from this realization that the Cátedra Gobierno Abierto, Participación Ciudadana y Open Data promoted by the Conselleria de Transparencia, Responsabilidad Social, Participación y Cooperación de la Generalitat Valenciana and the Universitat de València aims to carry out qualitative research that provides us with information on the processes of inclusion and boosting citizen participation in social policies at the local administration level. In this paper we present the results of the analytical exercise that we have carried out within the framework of this qualitative research: to compare the discourses on the impulse of participation policies at the local level coming from institutional agents (what we have called institutional participation), with the basic precepts of the PRA as a method. The research presented here has, since its inception, looked at the Autonomous Community as a unit of analysis. Fifteen semi-structured interviews have been conducted with local political actors from the areas of citizen participation in Castellón, Alicante and Valencia City Councils. The analysis of qualitative material points to some barriers and confusions, both regarding the concept of participation itself and the lack of consideration of PRA as a process, which emerge as limitations for the implementation of participation policies at the local level. The conclusion that can be drawn points to the need to articulate a model of participation for the País Valencià.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it